Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
12 Oct, 15 > 18 Oct, 15
31 Dec, 12 > 6 Jan, 13
9 Jan, 12 > 15 Jan, 12
29 Aug, 11 > 4 Sep, 11
8 Aug, 11 > 14 Aug, 11
25 Jul, 11 > 31 Jul, 11
18 Jul, 11 > 24 Jul, 11
18 Apr, 11 > 24 Apr, 11
24 Jan, 11 > 30 Jan, 11
27 Dec, 10 > 2 Jan, 11
13 Dec, 10 > 19 Dec, 10
25 Oct, 10 > 31 Oct, 10
11 Oct, 10 > 17 Oct, 10
27 Sep, 10 > 3 Oct, 10
13 Sep, 10 > 19 Sep, 10
6 Sep, 10 > 12 Sep, 10
30 Aug, 10 > 5 Sep, 10
23 Aug, 10 > 29 Aug, 10
16 Aug, 10 > 22 Aug, 10
9 Aug, 10 > 15 Aug, 10
26 Jul, 10 > 1 Aug, 10
28 Jun, 10 > 4 Jul, 10
21 Jun, 10 > 27 Jun, 10
14 Jun, 10 > 20 Jun, 10
24 May, 10 > 30 May, 10
17 May, 10 > 23 May, 10
10 May, 10 > 16 May, 10
26 Apr, 10 > 2 May, 10
19 Apr, 10 > 25 Apr, 10
29 Mar, 10 > 4 Apr, 10
22 Mar, 10 > 28 Mar, 10
1 Mar, 10 > 7 Mar, 10
25 Jan, 10 > 31 Jan, 10
18 Jan, 10 > 24 Jan, 10
28 Dec, 09 > 3 Jan, 10
21 Dec, 09 > 27 Dec, 09
23 Nov, 09 > 29 Nov, 09
5 Oct, 09 > 11 Oct, 09
21 Sep, 09 > 27 Sep, 09
7 Sep, 09 > 13 Sep, 09
10 Aug, 09 > 16 Aug, 09
20 Jul, 09 > 26 Jul, 09
22 Jun, 09 > 28 Jun, 09
15 Jun, 09 > 21 Jun, 09
25 May, 09 > 31 May, 09
18 May, 09 > 24 May, 09
11 May, 09 > 17 May, 09
4 May, 09 > 10 May, 09
27 Apr, 09 > 3 May, 09
13 Apr, 09 > 19 Apr, 09
6 Apr, 09 > 12 Apr, 09
30 Mar, 09 > 5 Apr, 09
2 Mar, 09 > 8 Mar, 09
23 Feb, 09 > 1 Mar, 09
16 Feb, 09 > 22 Feb, 09
2 Feb, 09 > 8 Feb, 09
26 Jan, 09 > 1 Feb, 09
19 Jan, 09 > 25 Jan, 09
12 Jan, 09 > 18 Jan, 09
5 Jan, 09 > 11 Jan, 09
22 Dec, 08 > 28 Dec, 08
15 Dec, 08 > 21 Dec, 08
8 Dec, 08 > 14 Dec, 08
24 Nov, 08 > 30 Nov, 08
17 Nov, 08 > 23 Nov, 08
10 Nov, 08 > 16 Nov, 08
3 Nov, 08 > 9 Nov, 08
27 Oct, 08 > 2 Nov, 08
20 Oct, 08 > 26 Oct, 08
13 Oct, 08 > 19 Oct, 08
6 Oct, 08 > 12 Oct, 08
15 Sep, 08 > 21 Sep, 08
8 Sep, 08 > 14 Sep, 08
25 Aug, 08 > 31 Aug, 08
18 Aug, 08 > 24 Aug, 08
11 Aug, 08 > 17 Aug, 08
4 Aug, 08 > 10 Aug, 08
21 Jul, 08 > 27 Jul, 08
14 Jul, 08 > 20 Jul, 08
30 Jun, 08 > 6 Jul, 08
26 May, 08 > 1 Jun, 08
19 May, 08 > 25 May, 08
14 Apr, 08 > 20 Apr, 08
17 Mar, 08 > 23 Mar, 08
3 Mar, 08 > 9 Mar, 08
25 Feb, 08 > 2 Mar, 08
18 Feb, 08 > 24 Feb, 08
11 Feb, 08 > 17 Feb, 08
4 Feb, 08 > 10 Feb, 08
21 Jan, 08 > 27 Jan, 08
31 Dec, 07 > 6 Jan, 08
24 Dec, 07 > 30 Dec, 07
3 Dec, 07 > 9 Dec, 07
12 Nov, 07 > 18 Nov, 07
5 Nov, 07 > 11 Nov, 07
8 Oct, 07 > 14 Oct, 07
1 Oct, 07 > 7 Oct, 07
10 Sep, 07 > 16 Sep, 07
27 Aug, 07 > 2 Sep, 07
16 Jul, 07 > 22 Jul, 07
9 Jul, 07 > 15 Jul, 07
25 Jun, 07 > 1 Jul, 07
18 Jun, 07 > 24 Jun, 07
11 Jun, 07 > 17 Jun, 07
28 May, 07 > 3 Jun, 07
21 May, 07 > 27 May, 07
14 May, 07 > 20 May, 07
30 Apr, 07 > 6 May, 07
23 Apr, 07 > 29 Apr, 07
16 Apr, 07 > 22 Apr, 07
2 Apr, 07 > 8 Apr, 07
19 Mar, 07 > 25 Mar, 07
12 Mar, 07 > 18 Mar, 07
5 Mar, 07 > 11 Mar, 07
26 Feb, 07 > 4 Mar, 07
19 Feb, 07 > 25 Feb, 07
12 Feb, 07 > 18 Feb, 07
5 Feb, 07 > 11 Feb, 07
22 Jan, 07 > 28 Jan, 07
11 Dec, 06 > 17 Dec, 06
4 Dec, 06 > 10 Dec, 06
27 Nov, 06 > 3 Dec, 06
20 Nov, 06 > 26 Nov, 06
13 Nov, 06 > 19 Nov, 06
6 Nov, 06 > 12 Nov, 06
30 Oct, 06 > 5 Nov, 06
23 Oct, 06 > 29 Oct, 06
2 Oct, 06 > 8 Oct, 06
18 Sep, 06 > 24 Sep, 06
11 Sep, 06 > 17 Sep, 06
4 Sep, 06 > 10 Sep, 06
5 Jun, 06 > 11 Jun, 06
10 Apr, 06 > 16 Apr, 06
27 Mar, 06 > 2 Apr, 06
20 Mar, 06 > 26 Mar, 06
13 Mar, 06 > 19 Mar, 06
6 Mar, 06 > 12 Mar, 06
27 Feb, 06 > 5 Mar, 06
20 Feb, 06 > 26 Feb, 06
13 Feb, 06 > 19 Feb, 06
16 Jan, 06 > 22 Jan, 06
2 Jan, 06 > 8 Jan, 06
26 Dec, 05 > 1 Jan, 06
19 Dec, 05 > 25 Dec, 05
12 Dec, 05 > 18 Dec, 05
5 Dec, 05 > 11 Dec, 05
28 Nov, 05 > 4 Dec, 05
21 Nov, 05 > 27 Nov, 05
14 Nov, 05 > 20 Nov, 05
7 Nov, 05 > 13 Nov, 05
24 Oct, 05 > 30 Oct, 05
17 Oct, 05 > 23 Oct, 05
3 Oct, 05 > 9 Oct, 05
19 Sep, 05 > 25 Sep, 05
5 Sep, 05 > 11 Sep, 05
29 Aug, 05 > 4 Sep, 05
15 Aug, 05 > 21 Aug, 05
8 Aug, 05 > 14 Aug, 05
1 Aug, 05 > 7 Aug, 05
18 Jul, 05 > 24 Jul, 05
11 Jul, 05 > 17 Jul, 05
4 Jul, 05 > 10 Jul, 05
27 Jun, 05 > 3 Jul, 05
20 Jun, 05 > 26 Jun, 05
13 Jun, 05 > 19 Jun, 05
6 Jun, 05 > 12 Jun, 05
23 May, 05 > 29 May, 05
16 May, 05 > 22 May, 05
9 May, 05 > 15 May, 05
2 May, 05 > 8 May, 05
18 Apr, 05 > 24 Apr, 05
11 Apr, 05 > 17 Apr, 05
4 Apr, 05 > 10 Apr, 05
28 Mar, 05 > 3 Apr, 05
21 Mar, 05 > 27 Mar, 05
14 Mar, 05 > 20 Mar, 05
7 Mar, 05 > 13 Mar, 05
28 Feb, 05 > 6 Mar, 05
7 Feb, 05 > 13 Feb, 05
31 Jan, 05 > 6 Feb, 05
24 Jan, 05 > 30 Jan, 05
17 Jan, 05 > 23 Jan, 05
10 Jan, 05 > 16 Jan, 05
3 Jan, 05 > 9 Jan, 05
27 Dec, 04 > 2 Jan, 05
20 Dec, 04 > 26 Dec, 04
13 Dec, 04 > 19 Dec, 04
6 Dec, 04 > 12 Dec, 04
15 Nov, 04 > 21 Nov, 04
8 Nov, 04 > 14 Nov, 04
1 Nov, 04 > 7 Nov, 04
18 Oct, 04 > 24 Oct, 04
11 Oct, 04 > 17 Oct, 04
4 Oct, 04 > 10 Oct, 04
20 Sep, 04 > 26 Sep, 04
13 Sep, 04 > 19 Sep, 04
6 Sep, 04 > 12 Sep, 04
30 Aug, 04 > 5 Sep, 04
16 Aug, 04 > 22 Aug, 04
9 Aug, 04 > 15 Aug, 04
2 Aug, 04 > 8 Aug, 04
26 Jul, 04 > 1 Aug, 04
19 Jul, 04 > 25 Jul, 04
5 Jul, 04 > 11 Jul, 04
28 Jun, 04 > 4 Jul, 04
21 Jun, 04 > 27 Jun, 04
14 Jun, 04 > 20 Jun, 04
7 Jun, 04 > 13 Jun, 04
31 May, 04 > 6 Jun, 04
24 May, 04 > 30 May, 04
10 May, 04 > 16 May, 04
3 May, 04 > 9 May, 04
26 Apr, 04 > 2 May, 04
12 Apr, 04 > 18 Apr, 04
5 Apr, 04 > 11 Apr, 04
29 Mar, 04 > 4 Apr, 04
22 Mar, 04 > 28 Mar, 04
15 Mar, 04 > 21 Mar, 04
1 Mar, 04 > 7 Mar, 04
23 Feb, 04 > 29 Feb, 04
9 Feb, 04 > 15 Feb, 04
2 Feb, 04 > 8 Feb, 04
26 Jan, 04 > 1 Feb, 04
12 Jan, 04 > 18 Jan, 04
5 Jan, 04 > 11 Jan, 04
29 Dec, 03 > 4 Jan, 04
22 Dec, 03 > 28 Dec, 03
1 Dec, 03 > 7 Dec, 03
24 Nov, 03 > 30 Nov, 03
10 Nov, 03 > 16 Nov, 03
3 Nov, 03 > 9 Nov, 03
27 Oct, 03 > 2 Nov, 03
20 Oct, 03 > 26 Oct, 03
6 Oct, 03 > 12 Oct, 03
29 Sep, 03 > 5 Oct, 03
8 Sep, 03 > 14 Sep, 03
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
LarryNaselli.com
Thursday, January 13, 2005
Two Anniversaries

This month marks two significant anniversaries, one which will make national news and one which won't. Thirty-two years ago the U.S. Supreme Court usurped the legislative powers of the People's elected representatives, declaring their acts restricting abortion unconstitutional.

A few years before that, a baby girl, born to an unwed young woman in Ohio the month before, was adopted by an infertile married couple. The relevant laws of the State of Ohio in those days gave priority to protecting the innocent human life in the womb, rather than to the convenience or wishes of the pregnant woman; therefore an "unwanted child" was brought into this world -- an event regarded as a tragedy by many advocates of abortion.

The life of that "unwanted child" illustrates the small-mindedness of the pro-abortion case. The barren couple desperately wanted her. Her adopted brother, aunts and uncles, cousins, classmates, teachers and friends all had their lives enriched by her. Since I married her twenty years ago, my life has been immeasurably enriched by her; and our eight healthy, happy children would not even exist had this "unwanted child" been subjected to Pro-Choice logic.

It would take a book to chronicle the ripples of Gail Naselli's life, and when our own children marry and have children, many volumes will not suffice. If the world is richer with Gail -- and it certainly is -- then the world would be poorer without her. The same is true for every "unwanted child."

The anniversary of Gail's adoption provides a reminder of the incalculable potential and the beauty of a human life, which can be seen both in what Gail has given to others, and in the opportunities her life has offered others to rise to acts of goodness, as Gene and Edith did when they brought an "unwanted" baby into their family. The other anniversary provides a reminder of the ugliness of that selfishness which indulges the convenience of the moment, at the expense of the potential of the future. It denies beauty, hope, and the redemptive power of doing what is right even when it is difficult.

I am so thankful that the People of Ohio had enacted laws to secure the inalienable right to life for that unborn baby who grew up to be my wife and the mother of our children, and I'm looking forward to the day when the tyranny of unelected activist judges is undone, so that the good People of all these United States can once again make wise laws, to protect the lives of the helpless from those who would "protect" them from being "unwanted."

Posted by larry_naselli at 10:28 AM CST
Updated: Thursday, January 13, 2005 10:35 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, January 12, 2005
George W. Tweakmeister

In an interview with the Washington Times, President Bush's said, "I don't see how someone can be President without having a relationship with the Lord." Besides being a perfectly reasonable remark, by someone who has such a relationship, and has held the job for four years, was this G.W.'s way of tweaking all those very high-strung Liberals, who are still confounded and exasperated by the idea that Christians provided President Bush with the winning margin of his re-election?


Posted by larry_naselli at 4:46 PM CST
Updated: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 4:47 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Nickname

You've heard that President Bush gives nicknames to everybody around him? I wonder what he calls Alberto Gonzalez. How about "Thumbscrews"?

Posted by larry_naselli at 9:36 AM CST
Updated: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 9:37 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, January 10, 2005
Dems Brush Up

LarryNaselli.com has obtained a top-secret strategy memo from DNC Headquarters, in the form of the theme song for the 2008 Democrat National Convention. Party leaders are hoping the song will provide talking points for Democrat candidates trying to connect with those enigmatic "Values Voters," who swung overwhelmingly to Bush and the Republicans in the 2004 election.

(To the tune of "Brush up your Shakespeare")

Brush up your scripture, start quoting it now.
Brush up your scripture, and the voters you will wow.

If they view same sex pairs with disfavor, just resort to the old "Love your neighbor."
Brush up your scripture, `cause we're all pious now.

If they're hooked on that quaint "under God" phrase, see how "Don't take the Lord's Name in vain" plays.
Brush up your scripture, `cause we're all pious now.

Brush up your scripture, start quoting it now.
Brush up your scripture, and the voters you will wow.

If our spending is filling them with dread, say you think "faith without works is so dead."
Brush up your scripture, `cause we're all pious now.

If they don't think that porno is free speech, use the old "do not judge, lest you be..." speech.
Brush up your scripture, `cause we're all pious now.

Brush up your scripture, start quoting it now.
Brush up your scripture, and the voters you will wow.

If they don't like our activist judges, tell them James 5:9 says, "Don't hold grudges."
Brush up your scripture`cause we're all pious now.

If those Red States want prayer in the Classroom, just start talking like Balaam's dumb ass to `em.
Brush up your scripture, `cause we're all pious now.

Brush up your scripture, `cause we're all_____pi___ous now.




Lyrics Copyright 2005 by Larry Naselli

Posted by larry_naselli at 8:07 AM CST
Updated: Monday, January 10, 2005 8:34 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Maybe a new Motto will help . . . with a Bible Verse!

Democrats are still struggling to connect with the "Values Voters," who handed George W. Bush and the Republican Party a decisive victory in the November elections. Leading Democrats have even resorted to quoting the Bible every time they come within ten feet of a microphone. It hasn't really helped, so perhaps a new Party Motto, incorporating a Bible Verse to communicate the heart and soul of the Democrat Party could win back some of those Red States. How about this one?

"We're Today's Democrat Party: Poisoned by bitterness - Bound by iniquity."

Posted by larry_naselli at 8:06 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Of Fat Cats and Reform

"They are trying to destroy Social Security by giving the money to the fat cats on Wall Street" - Senate Minority Leader, Harry Reid (D-NV)

Excuse me Senator Reid, what happens to Social Security tax revenues today? They are "borrowed" by the Congress to pay for current Federal spending. It sounds like the Senator's complaint is a case of the fat cats in Congress worried about Wall Street fat cats cutting in on their territory.

But, the fat cat label rings pretty hollow in a nation in which more than half the working population has investments in the stock markets; and it is worth noting at this point that the fairly recent phenomenon of broad-based stock ownership was spawned by President Reagan's introduction of IRA's and other tax-deferred retirement savings accounts, and that Reagan was likewise accused by Liberal Democrats of pillaging working people to enrich the wealthy. Yet, Reagan's policies have done more to increase the net worth of working people than all the government handouts ever devised by "compassionate" Liberals.

A rise in the value of stock markets, brought on by the vastly increased demand for equity investments which would attend the creation of Personal Social Security Accounts, would cause an increase in the wealth of almost everyone invested in the stock markets (and certainly of small investors who tend to own lower risk diversified mutual funds). But, besides the benefit to middle-class investors, this rise in value would also mean a benefit to upper-class investors, and that is unacceptable to Liberal Purists, no matter how good it is for the working people they supposedly speak for.

Harry Reid, for his part, may not be a Liberal Purist; but he is a Democrat Partisan, who understands that the Social Security entitlement has been instrumental in maintaining his Party's electoral coalition for over half a century. One of the less sinister interpretations of Reid's knee-jerk opposition to reform is that it is motivated by fear of the unknown. But, Democrat political security in the status quo may be an illusion, judging by the demographic trend toward this becoming a nation of investors - what President Bush calls "an ownership society" - and Democrats are likely to pay a heavy political price for choosing the wrong side on Social Security reform.

So, will Democrat Party leaders see the wisdom of an alternate approach to the politics of Class Warfare, demonization and obstruction. Harry Reid's remarks suggest that no such fresh thinking will result from his ascension.

Posted by larry_naselli at 8:05 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, January 7, 2005
Socialism could hold key to making abortion rare

Pro Lifers won a huge victory last year, when President Bush placed his signature on legislation outlawing Partial Birth Abortion. Passed by large majorities of both House and Senate for the third time in less than a decade (Bill Clinton vetoed the Bill twice, and was sustained by a mere three Senate votes from being over-ridden), the ban finally became law, just as George W. Bush had promised in the 2000 Campaign, proving the wisdom of Pro Life voters' support for Bush at the polls.

Furthermore, the long-term effectiveness of the Pro Life side in winning the battle for hearts and minds was illustrated by this comical phrase widely adopted by Big Media: "the procedure opponents call `partial birth abortion.'" Try to imagine Dan Rather or Katie Couric saying, "the procedure opponents call `lynching,'" or "the agenda proponents call `Gay Rights.'" Such euphemizing reveals not only a transparent taking of sides by the "objective" Media, but also a tacit admission that the Pro Life side is getting through in the communication war, and a lack of confidence in substantive counter-arguments.

Bravo for our victory in the Partial Birth Abortion battle, but while we are riding high, I want to propose a change of Pro Life strategy.

The efforts of Pro Life Conservatives have for years been focused on restoring the Constitutional function of elected representative lawmaking bodies, which was usurped by the Federal Courts through Roe v. Wade, and it's various "offspring."

The fight against abortion has been a long, hard struggle, and a noble one, fought against a multi-billion dollar abortion industry, the overwhelming bias of cultural, academic and media elites, and the muscle of ever more assertive judicial tyranny by Federal and State Courts. It has often been a heartbreaking battle of one step forward, three steps back.

But, could this battle also be an unnecessary one? I think we've been fighting the hard way! It's time for Conseratives to combine what we know about economics with what Liberals fancy about government, to make abortions scarce. It's time to think outside the box. It's time to Nationalize abortion.

This approach would offer so many things Liberals love: taxpayer funding, price controls, Labor Unions. After all, didn't you feel much safer after Daschle's Senate Democrats succeeded in making all airport security workers unionized Federal Government employees? So too with Nationalized Abortion. Women who want their unborn offspring eliminated will feel much more confident with a unionized government employee doing the killing, rather than some profit-driven private practitioner. And with Nationalized Abortion will come the efficiency of the Post Office, the compassion of the IRS, the results of the Public Schools, and the cost-effectiveness of Medicare. What more could Liberals want? It will be easy to get them on board.

Ronald Reagan once observed, "if Socialism came to the Sahara, it wouldn't be long before they had a shortage of sand." Likewise, if we turned abortion into a government program, intended to provide the most abortions, at the lowest price, to the greatest number of people, we could count on socialism to do what socialism does best: screw things up. Which, in the case of abortion, would be the ideal oucome.

Keep in mind that the clock would always be ticking against the inevitable shortage of supply that attends a socialist "market." Young women queing-up for their turn at the Government Abortion Mill would have lots more time to consider the little human being alive inside their womb, and might even reach full term and give birth while waiting for some shiftless civil servant to call their number. The potential for saving millions of babies' lives is staggering; so I say to Nationalization: bring it on.

Posted by larry_naselli at 1:45 PM CST
Updated: Monday, January 10, 2005 11:13 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Saturday, January 1, 2005
In My Pajamas?

The bloggers who exposed CBS 60 Minutes' use of forgeries to damage President Bush's re-election campaign were derisively described by CNN chief Jonathan Klein as "a guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas." Well, it turned out that the guys in their pajamas got the facts straight, and CBS was peddling partisan lies.

It has often happened that a term originated to convey derision becomes a proudly and voluntarily borne identity. It is with that in mind that, as of 1 January 2005, I have re-named this weblog "InMyPajamasBlog."


Posted by larry_naselli at 12:01 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, December 21, 2004
1,000 Home Run Careers Coming Soon

If John McCain is half as successful at getting steroids out of Major League Baseball as he was at getting Soft Money out of Politics, baseball fans are likely to see many players achieve 1,000 career home runs during McCain's lifetime.

Posted by larry_naselli at 5:43 PM CST
Updated: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 1:04 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, December 16, 2004
Arm-Twisting

When President Bush leans on wobbly Republican Legislators to pass legislation making the Bush Tax Cuts permanent, I wonder if the network talking heads, Democrat Senators, and the 9/11 Victims (Leftist) Wives who castigated Bush for not applying enough pressure to pass the Intel Reform Bill, will applaud the President for arm-twisting to get an important Bill passed through the Congress.





Posted by larry_naselli at 1:13 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, December 10, 2004
Scandal Naming

The chattering class has dubbed every scandal and scandalet since Watergate as x-gate? Well, since the Left-Media is ever-so-slowly getting around to starting to commence to consider thinking about perhaps noticing that maybe they ought to notice that they really should probably get started acknowledging the existence of, if not actually covering, reporting upon, or investigating the U.N. Oil For Food Scandal, I want to (as a Bush voter) pre-empt the inevitable naming of this scandal "Oil for Food-gate." In that cause, I hereby offer the better scandal title of U.N.-RON



Posted by larry_naselli at 3:22 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Gen-O

The current generation of American Youth should be known as Generation O, as in "Orphan"; because the dominant factor in the formation of their character is the absence and diminished influence of their parents.

Posted by larry_naselli at 9:34 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
If I might paraphrase Reagan . . .

The United Nations is the focus of corruption in the modern World.


Posted by larry_naselli at 9:30 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, December 6, 2004
Lost Appetite for Divided Government

The clich? which routinely masquerades as wisdom in the world of punditry is that America needs "divided government" (i.e. Democrat Congress / Republican Executive, or Republican Congress / Democrat Executive) in order to prevent excessive concentration of power in any one political entity.

Not surprisingly, this revelation lay dormant among The Wise until the 1996 Presidential campaign, when the possibility presented itself of simultaneous Republican control of both Houses of Congress and The White House. More importantly, the "Divided Government" idea proceeds from a fundamental misunderstanding of the Constitutional separation of powers, which divides the legislative, judicial and executive powers among branches of government, not between political parties.

As the House-Senate Conference Committee debate over Intelligence Reform legislation has demonstrated, the Legislative branch with it's regional accountability, has distinct interests and leverage that balance the interests of the Executive branch as well as the exigencies of Party Unity. So, even though Republicans currently control both Houses of Congress and the Presidency, the brilliant Constitutional balance is working as a hedge against important legislation passing with critical flaws.

Remarkably, the purveyors of conventional wisdom who, pre-November 2nd, were proclaiming the glories of "Divided Government" have spent the past three or four weeks in a Chicken Little-panic because governmental power is not concentrated enough.

When Republican Members of Congress oppose a Republican President on matters dear to Liberal hearts, they are hailed as "Mavericks" (as in, "Maverick Pennsylvania Senator, Arlen Specter, has vowed to stand up to Mr. Bush's attempts to pack the Federal Courts with misogynistic, snake-handling, racist, Bible-thumpers."), but when Republican lawmakers James Sensenbrenner and Duncan Hunter put the brakes on the Intelligence Reform Bill, because of their concerns that provisions of the Bill might compromise military combat operations, the pundit community did not confer "Maverick" status on the dissenters.

Instead Hunter and Sensenbrenner have been impugned, misrepresented and vilified in the corridors of elite opinion, while yesterday's acolytes of "Divided Government" have railed on President Bush for failing to adequately twist the arms of GOP legislators.

Ironically, the loudest proponents of "Divided Government" have suddenly lost their taste for opposition between the Executive and the Legislature. It strains one's credulity to grant that such changeable appetites spring from sincere convictions.




Posted by larry_naselli at 7:46 PM CST
Updated: Wednesday, December 8, 2004 12:19 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, November 16, 2004
Powell Biography [Parody]

LarryNaselli.com has obtained an advance copy of Bob Woodward's new unauthorized biography of Colin Powell's tenure as Secretary of State, Odd Man Out, 396p. Simon & Schuster $29.95.

Here is an excerpt from page 116, in a chapter on the Cabinet debate over Operation Iraqi Freedom:

"as the Secretary of State presented his case that America must pass the Global Test, rather than rush into a war that was likely to leave millions of innocent Iraqis dead, homeless or without adequate health care, Rice and Rumsfeld shot down Powell's non-ideological Centrist approach, like a Marine shooting down a wounded Iraqi in a Mosque.

Despite such setbacks, Powell soldiered on, trying to bring some balance to an administration that had been almost wholly taken over by Dick Cheney and the Neo-Cons. During those days, Powell often confided to his wife that to leave his job at State would be to abandon American policy to the whims of Halliburton, The Mossad and The Weekly Standard."

Posted by larry_naselli at 5:37 PM CST
Updated: Monday, December 6, 2004 6:53 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Justice For Treacherous Embeds

It will be a fitting irony when some terrorist - I mean some "insurgent," feigning he's dead, blows up an embedded Network News Crew, because the U.S. Marines hesitated an extra moment, out of concern that American Reporters might misrepresent their actions on the evening News.

Posted by larry_naselli at 9:33 AM CST
Updated: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:52 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Know Thy Enemy

The U.S. Marine who shot a wounded terrorist in a Fallujah Mosque committed a critical error in judgement. If he had correctly identified the enemy, he would have first shot the embedded Network News Crew, then shot the terrorist scum.

Posted by larry_naselli at 9:00 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, November 15, 2004
Statistical Sampling Makes a Comeback

The latest Bush-hating Democrat-Wacko delusion is that President Bush stole the election by hacking the voting computers in Ohio. This (ahem) "theory" would have been invested with credibility by ABC News' coverage of it -- if ABC News had any credibility to invest. Instead, ABC News has just lashed itself to the mast of the Democrat Paronoia ship.

Before examining the "evidence" for this latest charge of election stealing, permit me to bask in the irony that electronic voting machines have come into widespread use mainly in response to the Democrat-inspired hype that the "fatally flawed" punch-card balloting method cost Al Gore the 2000 Presidential Election. The fact that there was nothing flawed about the punch cards (although there were some hopelessly flawed Democrat voters, evidently lacking the elementary school mental prowess required to correctly cast a punch-card ballot, but nevertheless eminently qualified - we are assured -- to participate in the choice of our nation's chief executive), did not forestall the expenditure of untold millions of dollars to "upgrade" voting systems across the U.S.A. So far, no prominent Republican has been impolite enough to recommend to this year's bereaved Democrats that vote stealing by hacking could be prevented by getting rid of the computers, and using punch-card ballots. Perhaps Republicans are not wasting words because they realize that the only thing that will cause Democrat partisans to accept the election results is a Democrat victory.

Now as for the "evidence" ABC News has uncovered indicating that Republicans cheated: well, there is no evidence, just a plethora of emails from Democrats convinced that Bush stole the election (ABC has certainly come a long way from the old days - i.e. last month - when it studiously ignored Conservative Bloggers' rigorous exposure of CBS's use of forged documents to discredit President Bush's military service). The emails from Democrat partisans - er, I mean from non-partisan concerned citizens -- cite the disparity between the machine vote counts and the Network Exit Polls as prima facie proof that . . . the vote counts are wrong. In fact, it is the very absence of evidence that shows just how subtle this Republican scheme is, in acknowledgement of which Democrats exchange knowing glances, and confidently intone the words "Karl Rove," as if no further explanation or proof is necessary to pronounce the Bush victory a fraud.

While it may sound to you like these Democrats are un-hinged, their claims are actually consistent with mainstream Democrat "logic." Remember Bill Clinton's proposed Census Reform? The Great Prevaricator wanted to replace the current Census methodology of counting actual citizens, with a statistical sampling that would be extrapolated to calculate the population - Census Exit Polling you might say. Democrats apparently believe that if the educated guess differs from the actual count, go with the educated guess. The most generous interpretation I can put on that is impenetrable elitist arrogance, and that would be an educated guess consistent with the observable evidence.

Posted by larry_naselli at 11:43 AM CST
Updated: Monday, November 15, 2004 3:12 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, November 9, 2004
Specter Verdict

Arlen Specter celebrated his re-election to the U.S. Senate by throwing down a gauntlet to President Bush, warning the President that Conservative Judicial Nominees need not apply at Specter's Senate Judiciary Committee. The reaction from Conservatives was swift and impressive, as Senate mailboxes were jammed and phone lines shut down, by a flood of demands to deny Specter the Judiciary Chairmanship. Specter quickly tried to tap dance out of his tactical error, denying that he ever said the things he was captured on tape saying, and assuring Republicans that he would support the President's nominees, more or less.

So how should President Bush's supporters judge wanna-be Chairman Specter's putative repentence? Well, Senator Specter, see if you can understand this: if we were under Scottish Law, Conservatives would vote "Case Not Proved."

Posted by larry_naselli at 9:56 AM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, November 8, 2004
Known by his enemies

I know many Christians who don't see that George W. Bush was the Presidential choice that honors Biblical values, but the other side has no problem seeing it . . . and they are mad as Hades about it too.





This map was published in Germany's Der Spiegel, following President Bush's election victory.

"in this regard the children of darkness are wiser than the children of light."

Posted by larry_naselli at 2:16 PM CST
Updated: Friday, December 10, 2004 9:35 AM CST

Newer | Latest | Older