Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
12 Oct, 15 > 18 Oct, 15
7 Jan, 13 > 13 Jan, 13
16 Jan, 12 > 22 Jan, 12
29 Aug, 11 > 4 Sep, 11
8 Aug, 11 > 14 Aug, 11
1 Aug, 11 > 7 Aug, 11
18 Jul, 11 > 24 Jul, 11
25 Apr, 11 > 1 May, 11
31 Jan, 11 > 6 Feb, 11
24 Jan, 11 > 30 Jan, 11
27 Dec, 10 > 2 Jan, 11
13 Dec, 10 > 19 Dec, 10
1 Nov, 10 > 7 Nov, 10
18 Oct, 10 > 24 Oct, 10
11 Oct, 10 > 17 Oct, 10
27 Sep, 10 > 3 Oct, 10
20 Sep, 10 > 26 Sep, 10
13 Sep, 10 > 19 Sep, 10
30 Aug, 10 > 5 Sep, 10
23 Aug, 10 > 29 Aug, 10
9 Aug, 10 > 15 Aug, 10
2 Aug, 10 > 8 Aug, 10
5 Jul, 10 > 11 Jul, 10
28 Jun, 10 > 4 Jul, 10
21 Jun, 10 > 27 Jun, 10
31 May, 10 > 6 Jun, 10
24 May, 10 > 30 May, 10
17 May, 10 > 23 May, 10
26 Apr, 10 > 2 May, 10
5 Apr, 10 > 11 Apr, 10
29 Mar, 10 > 4 Apr, 10
22 Mar, 10 > 28 Mar, 10
8 Mar, 10 > 14 Mar, 10
1 Feb, 10 > 7 Feb, 10
25 Jan, 10 > 31 Jan, 10
4 Jan, 10 > 10 Jan, 10
21 Dec, 09 > 27 Dec, 09
23 Nov, 09 > 29 Nov, 09
12 Oct, 09 > 18 Oct, 09
28 Sep, 09 > 4 Oct, 09
14 Sep, 09 > 20 Sep, 09
10 Aug, 09 > 16 Aug, 09
27 Jul, 09 > 2 Aug, 09
20 Jul, 09 > 26 Jul, 09
29 Jun, 09 > 5 Jul, 09
22 Jun, 09 > 28 Jun, 09
1 Jun, 09 > 7 Jun, 09
25 May, 09 > 31 May, 09
11 May, 09 > 17 May, 09
27 Apr, 09 > 3 May, 09
13 Apr, 09 > 19 Apr, 09
6 Apr, 09 > 12 Apr, 09
9 Mar, 09 > 15 Mar, 09
2 Mar, 09 > 8 Mar, 09
16 Feb, 09 > 22 Feb, 09
9 Feb, 09 > 15 Feb, 09
2 Feb, 09 > 8 Feb, 09
26 Jan, 09 > 1 Feb, 09
19 Jan, 09 > 25 Jan, 09
12 Jan, 09 > 18 Jan, 09
5 Jan, 09 > 11 Jan, 09
22 Dec, 08 > 28 Dec, 08
15 Dec, 08 > 21 Dec, 08
8 Dec, 08 > 14 Dec, 08
24 Nov, 08 > 30 Nov, 08
17 Nov, 08 > 23 Nov, 08
10 Nov, 08 > 16 Nov, 08
3 Nov, 08 > 9 Nov, 08
27 Oct, 08 > 2 Nov, 08
20 Oct, 08 > 26 Oct, 08
13 Oct, 08 > 19 Oct, 08
22 Sep, 08 > 28 Sep, 08
15 Sep, 08 > 21 Sep, 08
8 Sep, 08 > 14 Sep, 08
1 Sep, 08 > 7 Sep, 08
18 Aug, 08 > 24 Aug, 08
11 Aug, 08 > 17 Aug, 08
28 Jul, 08 > 3 Aug, 08
21 Jul, 08 > 27 Jul, 08
30 Jun, 08 > 6 Jul, 08
2 Jun, 08 > 8 Jun, 08
26 May, 08 > 1 Jun, 08
19 May, 08 > 25 May, 08
21 Apr, 08 > 27 Apr, 08
24 Mar, 08 > 30 Mar, 08
17 Mar, 08 > 23 Mar, 08
10 Mar, 08 > 16 Mar, 08
3 Mar, 08 > 9 Mar, 08
25 Feb, 08 > 2 Mar, 08
18 Feb, 08 > 24 Feb, 08
11 Feb, 08 > 17 Feb, 08
4 Feb, 08 > 10 Feb, 08
28 Jan, 08 > 3 Feb, 08
7 Jan, 08 > 13 Jan, 08
31 Dec, 07 > 6 Jan, 08
3 Dec, 07 > 9 Dec, 07
19 Nov, 07 > 25 Nov, 07
12 Nov, 07 > 18 Nov, 07
8 Oct, 07 > 14 Oct, 07
1 Oct, 07 > 7 Oct, 07
17 Sep, 07 > 23 Sep, 07
10 Sep, 07 > 16 Sep, 07
27 Aug, 07 > 2 Sep, 07
23 Jul, 07 > 29 Jul, 07
9 Jul, 07 > 15 Jul, 07
2 Jul, 07 > 8 Jul, 07
18 Jun, 07 > 24 Jun, 07
11 Jun, 07 > 17 Jun, 07
4 Jun, 07 > 10 Jun, 07
21 May, 07 > 27 May, 07
14 May, 07 > 20 May, 07
30 Apr, 07 > 6 May, 07
23 Apr, 07 > 29 Apr, 07
2 Apr, 07 > 8 Apr, 07
26 Mar, 07 > 1 Apr, 07
12 Mar, 07 > 18 Mar, 07
5 Mar, 07 > 11 Mar, 07
26 Feb, 07 > 4 Mar, 07
19 Feb, 07 > 25 Feb, 07
12 Feb, 07 > 18 Feb, 07
5 Feb, 07 > 11 Feb, 07
29 Jan, 07 > 4 Feb, 07
18 Dec, 06 > 24 Dec, 06
11 Dec, 06 > 17 Dec, 06
4 Dec, 06 > 10 Dec, 06
27 Nov, 06 > 3 Dec, 06
20 Nov, 06 > 26 Nov, 06
13 Nov, 06 > 19 Nov, 06
6 Nov, 06 > 12 Nov, 06
30 Oct, 06 > 5 Nov, 06
9 Oct, 06 > 15 Oct, 06
2 Oct, 06 > 8 Oct, 06
25 Sep, 06 > 1 Oct, 06
18 Sep, 06 > 24 Sep, 06
11 Sep, 06 > 17 Sep, 06
12 Jun, 06 > 18 Jun, 06
5 Jun, 06 > 11 Jun, 06
17 Apr, 06 > 23 Apr, 06
3 Apr, 06 > 9 Apr, 06
27 Mar, 06 > 2 Apr, 06
20 Mar, 06 > 26 Mar, 06
13 Mar, 06 > 19 Mar, 06
6 Mar, 06 > 12 Mar, 06
27 Feb, 06 > 5 Mar, 06
20 Feb, 06 > 26 Feb, 06
13 Feb, 06 > 19 Feb, 06
23 Jan, 06 > 29 Jan, 06
9 Jan, 06 > 15 Jan, 06
2 Jan, 06 > 8 Jan, 06
26 Dec, 05 > 1 Jan, 06
19 Dec, 05 > 25 Dec, 05
12 Dec, 05 > 18 Dec, 05
5 Dec, 05 > 11 Dec, 05
21 Nov, 05 > 27 Nov, 05
14 Nov, 05 > 20 Nov, 05
31 Oct, 05 > 6 Nov, 05
17 Oct, 05 > 23 Oct, 05
10 Oct, 05 > 16 Oct, 05
3 Oct, 05 > 9 Oct, 05
26 Sep, 05 > 2 Oct, 05
12 Sep, 05 > 18 Sep, 05
29 Aug, 05 > 4 Sep, 05
22 Aug, 05 > 28 Aug, 05
15 Aug, 05 > 21 Aug, 05
8 Aug, 05 > 14 Aug, 05
1 Aug, 05 > 7 Aug, 05
25 Jul, 05 > 31 Jul, 05
18 Jul, 05 > 24 Jul, 05
11 Jul, 05 > 17 Jul, 05
4 Jul, 05 > 10 Jul, 05
27 Jun, 05 > 3 Jul, 05
20 Jun, 05 > 26 Jun, 05
13 Jun, 05 > 19 Jun, 05
30 May, 05 > 5 Jun, 05
23 May, 05 > 29 May, 05
16 May, 05 > 22 May, 05
9 May, 05 > 15 May, 05
2 May, 05 > 8 May, 05
18 Apr, 05 > 24 Apr, 05
4 Apr, 05 > 10 Apr, 05
28 Mar, 05 > 3 Apr, 05
21 Mar, 05 > 27 Mar, 05
14 Mar, 05 > 20 Mar, 05
7 Mar, 05 > 13 Mar, 05
14 Feb, 05 > 20 Feb, 05
7 Feb, 05 > 13 Feb, 05
31 Jan, 05 > 6 Feb, 05
24 Jan, 05 > 30 Jan, 05
17 Jan, 05 > 23 Jan, 05
10 Jan, 05 > 16 Jan, 05
3 Jan, 05 > 9 Jan, 05
27 Dec, 04 > 2 Jan, 05
20 Dec, 04 > 26 Dec, 04
13 Dec, 04 > 19 Dec, 04
6 Dec, 04 > 12 Dec, 04
22 Nov, 04 > 28 Nov, 04
15 Nov, 04 > 21 Nov, 04
8 Nov, 04 > 14 Nov, 04
1 Nov, 04 > 7 Nov, 04
25 Oct, 04 > 31 Oct, 04
11 Oct, 04 > 17 Oct, 04
27 Sep, 04 > 3 Oct, 04
20 Sep, 04 > 26 Sep, 04
13 Sep, 04 > 19 Sep, 04
6 Sep, 04 > 12 Sep, 04
30 Aug, 04 > 5 Sep, 04
16 Aug, 04 > 22 Aug, 04
9 Aug, 04 > 15 Aug, 04
2 Aug, 04 > 8 Aug, 04
26 Jul, 04 > 1 Aug, 04
19 Jul, 04 > 25 Jul, 04
12 Jul, 04 > 18 Jul, 04
5 Jul, 04 > 11 Jul, 04
28 Jun, 04 > 4 Jul, 04
21 Jun, 04 > 27 Jun, 04
14 Jun, 04 > 20 Jun, 04
7 Jun, 04 > 13 Jun, 04
31 May, 04 > 6 Jun, 04
10 May, 04 > 16 May, 04
3 May, 04 > 9 May, 04
19 Apr, 04 > 25 Apr, 04
12 Apr, 04 > 18 Apr, 04
5 Apr, 04 > 11 Apr, 04
29 Mar, 04 > 4 Apr, 04
22 Mar, 04 > 28 Mar, 04
15 Mar, 04 > 21 Mar, 04
8 Mar, 04 > 14 Mar, 04
1 Mar, 04 > 7 Mar, 04
23 Feb, 04 > 29 Feb, 04
16 Feb, 04 > 22 Feb, 04
9 Feb, 04 > 15 Feb, 04
26 Jan, 04 > 1 Feb, 04
19 Jan, 04 > 25 Jan, 04
12 Jan, 04 > 18 Jan, 04
5 Jan, 04 > 11 Jan, 04
29 Dec, 03 > 4 Jan, 04
22 Dec, 03 > 28 Dec, 03
8 Dec, 03 > 14 Dec, 03
1 Dec, 03 > 7 Dec, 03
17 Nov, 03 > 23 Nov, 03
3 Nov, 03 > 9 Nov, 03
27 Oct, 03 > 2 Nov, 03
20 Oct, 03 > 26 Oct, 03
13 Oct, 03 > 19 Oct, 03
6 Oct, 03 > 12 Oct, 03
15 Sep, 03 > 21 Sep, 03
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
LarryNaselli.com
Monday, November 1, 2004
An election that really matters

While I've long held passionate political convictions, this election is the first Presidential choice since 1984 in which I am genuinely concerned for the survival of our way of life. It's no secret that on domestic policy, I think George W. Bush is mostly right, and John Kerry is completely wrong; but domestic policy, important as it is, does not hold the potential for the near-term destruction of our way of life. Why? Because our democratic processes can correct most of what goes wrong, even if that takes a long time.

The issue at stake in this election, however, is not something America can afford to get wrong, then fix up later. America today is faced with mortal enemies, bent on visiting destruction on our way of life, and our very lives. These Jihadists are driven by a bloodthirsty ideology, and command the allegiance of thousands of killers, willing to sacrifice their own lives to the cause. This is not an enemy who can be reasoned or negotiated with, nor one who will voluntarily give up the fight. Our enemy is resourceful, technologically sophisticated, and has enjoyed the safe haven and support of nation-states who would like bad things to happen to America, but wouldn't dare engage the United States directly. Having the support of nation-states has allowed these outlaws a safe base of operations to plot, train, cache weapons, and launch acts of terrorism against America.

Prior to September 11, 2004, American policy toward these enemies was generally to treat each act of terrorism as a distinct incident, and pursue the perpetrators thereof for arrest, trial, conviction and imprisonment. This not only persuaded our enemies that America would not fight back, but it allowed al Qaeda to grow strong and prepare for the attacks that shocked the World. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, President Bush clearly outlined the nature of the threat, and a new strategy for confronting it.

As he explained in his January 2002 State of the Union message (by which time the U.S. had already toppled the Taliban in Afghanistan and put al Qaeda on the run), the danger to America comes from an Axis of Evil, comprised of terrorist groups with global reach, and nation states who support them and are developing weapons of mass destruction. President Bush included in that axis al Qaeda, Iraq, Iran and North Korea.

The President argued that if a terrorist group, like al Qaeda were to obtain chemical, biological or nuclear weapons they would not hesitate to use them against the United States, or against our interests in the World. In light of this threat, the U.S. must use whatever resources we have to actively prevent WMD from reaching the hands of terrorist groups. The President was crystal clear in telling us that different circumstances would call for different tactics, but all the threats would have to be addressed, if Americans are to live in safety.

After an agonizingly long thirteen months of trying to persuade the United Nations Security Council to enforce its own multiple Resolutions demanding that Saddam Hussein account for and give up his WMD and WMD Programs -- weapons and weapons programs that the U.N. and every national intelligence service in the World believed Saddam had -- President Bush acted to protect America, even though the French, Germans and Russians didn't like it.

I would say, "and you know the rest of the story," but if you've been getting your information from the network news and the major wire services, you don't know the rest of the story at all. You only know the bad news. Operation Iraqi Freedom has been costly, but it has been a costly success, so far. Besides the liberation of 25 million human beings from the most unspeakable brutality and tyranny, America is establishing a second self-governing democracy (along with Afghanistan) in the heart of the Middle East, where until recently we had an enemy destabilizing the region. When our news media reports only the costs, and not the successes, it's no wonder people start to view the mission as a disaster.

While sometimes unable to vie with the continuous disinformation served up by CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, AP, the NY Times, etc..., President Bush has been absolutely stalwart in his determination to see the War against Jihadist Terrorism to victory. This in the face of very loud and very virulent opposition, both at home and abroad.

Bush has proven himself to be a leader who will press on to victory, no matter what. Is John Kerry the kind of man who will make the hard choices, and put America's interests first, even when doing so brings the catcalls of Europe's elites? This much everybody knows by now, John Kerry has a Plan to win the War on Terrorism. What nobody can tell you is what that plan is! Even Kerry's staunchest supporters cannot say whether Kerry would withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq or put more troops in.

And that is merely one illustration of Kerry's fence-straddling. A man who either doesn't know his own mind, or conceals it for political motives is not the man to lead America in a time of war. Kerry wants us to believe it would be safe to return to the strategy of behaving as if we are not at war, while our Jihadist enemies are still at war with us. We tried that strategy during the 1990's and the end-result was that we were all minding our own business one beautiful September morning three years ago, when we were hit with the biggest sucker punch in our nation's history.

Contrary to John Kerry's assertion, America cannot return to a time when terrorism was just a nuisance, because no such time ever really existed in the first place, even though previous administrations responded to terrorist attacks as if they were a mere nuisance. Moreover, we live in an age when technology has raised the stakes of a defensive posture toward terrorism to an unbearable level.

The possibility of a terrorist attack against American cities involving WMD's demands that the United States take an offensive strategy to defeating terrorism. George W. Bush has pursued just such an offensive strategy, denying al Qaeda safe-haven in Afghanistan, putting Saddam Hussein out of business in Iraq, turning Pakistan from an al Qaeda supporter into an ally in the War on Terrorism, curtailing the Saudi's official support of radical Islamism and busting up both the Pakistani nuclear technology black market and Libya's nuclear weapons program. All this in addition to the capture or killing, by U.S. forces and our allies, of 75% of al Qaeda's senior leadership.

John Kerry is offering America self-doubt, retreat, global tests, and burying our head in the sand, in hopes that the bad guys will see that we mean them no harm and leave us alone. In short Kerry is offering us defeat in the War on Terrorism. George W. Bush is offering a hard fight, a relentless fight, and perserverance unto victory.

America must win the worldwide War on Terrorism, not merely capture Osama Bin Laden, as Kerry seems to think. If our children are going to grow up in an America that really is safe, then the United States has some heavy lifting to do today, and it won't necessarily be popular in the effete salons of Europe, or in the U.N. Security Council. That is why it really matters that George W. Bush be re-elected tommorrow.

Posted by larry_naselli at 1:59 PM CST
Updated: Monday, November 1, 2004 5:27 PM CST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, October 20, 2004
Not a moment too soon

Michael Medved, Hugh Hewitt, Laura Ingraham, Bill Bennett and others will finally be on the air in Chicago, beginning Monday November 1st, when Salem Broadcasting takes over WIND AM 560 with a Conservative Talk format.

This will constitute very stiff competition for WLS. Outside of Rush and Hannity, WLS has nothing to keep Conservative Listeners tuned in. The only downside is that WIND will also air the idiotic rabble-rouser, Michael Savage. Alas, nothing is perfect under the Sun.

Posted by larry_naselli at 11:08 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, October 11, 2004
Columbus should just admit he was wrong, and apologize

Speaking at Columbus Day festivities in Ohio, Presidential candidate, John Kerry, continued today to press Christopher Columbus to apologize for misleading the government of Spain, failing to consult the United Nations, and unilaterally rushing to exploration.

Kerry told reporters, "Columbus was wrong when he promised to find China on his voyage westward, and he broke that promise." Kerry continued, "The simple fact is, there was no westward route to China, and now Columbus' supporters are trying to divert attention from that fact by focusing on the discovery of the new world, which was never a part of Columbus original justification for going to sea."

Kerry continued, "I was at the Court in Madrid in '92 (it is seared, seared in me), and I spoke with the people over there, and I can tell you that Spanish leaders -- and they can't say this themselves publicly, of course, but people close to Ferdinand and Isabella told me, "we need you in there. We need somebody who knows how to get this done -- someone who can command these ships -- if we're going to keep those trade routes to the Orient from being outsourced to Halliburton and Jen-jiss [sic] Kahn."

"I know what it is to command a ship," Kerry continued, "unlike the President, I defended my country as the commander of a ship in Vietnam. When I see the Nina, Pinta and Santa Maria, I'm reminded of those days in the Mekong, when I was doing my duty while the President was using his privileged position to avoid his duty. And when I came home from serving my country in Vietnam, I was the one person who understood the right way to command a ship in a way that will pass the global test.

I'm proud that, because I saw that America was wrong in Vietnam, I came home and stood up against imperialism, including Columbus' practice of cutting off heads, cutting off ears, and cutting off noses, and I called for then -- as I do now -- a more sensitive exploration, in which we work together with our allies, instead of going it alone, as Columbus -- and I daresay, as this President has done."

Posted by larry_naselli at 11:27 AM CDT
Updated: Monday, October 11, 2004 12:25 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, October 6, 2004
Straddler

After watching the first Presidential debate I have come to the conclusion that John Kerry is not a Flip-Flopper. Kerry says the Iraq War was a mistake, and he says our troops are not dying for a mistake. Kerry says the world is safer with Saddam Hussein out of power, and he says the invasion of Iraq has made the world more dangerous. Kerry says he would be tougher than President Bush on Iran's quest for nukes, and he says the U.S. should provide nuclear fuel to Iran in exchange for the Mullahs' promise to stop developing nuclear weapons. Kerry says the U.S. should not confront rogue states unilaterally, and he insists that the U.S. should negotiate unilaterally with North Korea. Kerry says the Iraq War is a diversion from the War on Terrorism, and he says he will persuade more nations to send troops there. Kerry says he would use pre-emptive war, and he says he would submit America's defense to a "Global Test."

John Kerry is certainly no Flip-Flopper. That would mean Kerry changes his positions. What John Kerry actually does is hold contradictory positions simultaneously. Kerry is a Fence-Straddler, and on November 2nd John Kerry richly deserves the logical fate of a man who straddles fences.


Posted by larry_naselli at 12:01 AM CDT
Updated: Monday, October 11, 2004 8:49 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, September 24, 2004
Teresa -vs- John

Teresa H. Kerry believes the U.S.A. has already captured Osama Bin Laden, and President Bush is waiting to trot him out as an October surprise.

On the same day Teresa issued this "insight" John F. Kerry charged President Bush with dereliction as Commander in Chief, because he has not concentrated enough on capturing Osama Bin Laden.

Does John Kerry think his wife is wrong? If Bush already has Osama in the hopper, why on earth would he waste time and resources hunting for him? If Kerry thinks his wife is right, why would he want Bush to chase around an enemy whom we have already captured?

Posted by larry_naselli at 3:46 PM CDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink
Wednesday, September 15, 2004
How do you spell CBS? "L-a-u-g-h-i-n-g-s-t-o-c-k"

Obstinately standing by the now discredited National Guard memo forgeries that CBS/60 Minutes II used to smear President Bush, Dan Rather is beginning to sound like that knight in "Monty Python and the Holy Grail," who has every limb sheared off by the Black Knight, but continues hopping on his stumps, insisting "it's just a flesh wound."

When our family prays for President Bush, we often pray that "no weapon formed against him will prosper, and every tongue that rises against him in judgement will be condemned. For this is the heritage of the servants of the Lord, and their righteousness is [from God]." The past four years have been a continual fulfillment of that Word from God. The Leftmedia calls this phenomenon "teflon," because they can't (and don't want to) see the hand of God at work, especially in the life of a hayseed like George W. Bush, who doesn't even read The Holy Scriptures (i.e. The New York Times), and speaks in such a non-nuanced way about archaic concepts like "good and evil."

Conventional wisdom claimed that Clinton was a teflon president, too; but it's not so. As Slick Willie's personal approval ratings consistently demonstrated, most Americans despised him, but figured he was doing a good job, so why rock the boat? Clinton is a laughingstock to this day, except among the Democrat hardcore that worships his "success." Of course, the Democrats should be careful what they ask for, another eight years of "success" like Clinton brought to his Party, and you might have to visit the Field Museum to see a Democrat -- that exhibit could be appropriately placed beside the upcoming exhibit titled TV Network News.

Posted by larry_naselli at 9:36 AM CDT
Updated: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:13 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, September 13, 2004
60 Minutes Exclusive: Original Found by LarryNaselli.com

Be sure to watch 60 Minutes this week, when I will be on with Dan Rather for an exclusive one-hour interview, as 60 Minutes breaks the story that I have recently obtained the original document of the Ten Commandments (see below), which CBS News' document expert has confirmed to be the authentic document transmitted to Moses by God Himself at Mt. Sanai.

Of course, this is great news for LarryNaselli.com, both for the national publicity, and for the opportunity to be associated with a news organization of CBS's caliber.

From: Jehovah [J-h-v-h@heaven.org]
Sent: Monday, Sep 13, 2056BC 3:21 PM
To: Moses, et al. [mo@wildernessnet.com]
Subject: RE: ten commandments

M,
Following is a second copy of the commandments. See that you keep your head this time, so you do not break these again.
J


1. have no other gods before me
2. don't make or bow to graven images
3. don't use my name in vain
4. remember the sabbath day and keep it holy
5. honor your mother and father
6. don't murder
7. don't steal
8. don't bear false witness
9. don't commit adultery
10. don't covet

Posted by larry_naselli at 3:48 PM CDT
Updated: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 7:25 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, September 10, 2004
Requiem for a Once-Great Party (Election Year Update)
Now Playing: This is not your father's Democrat Party

With the Presidential Election Campaign having played out as it has, these reflections (originally written on 9/11/03) on the devolution of the Democrat Party seems especially relevant to update and replay.


it's hard to believe it's been only three years
since that horrible morning of terror and tears
when at last Dems of that Vietnam generation
gave first place to defending our vulnerable nation

when they stood by the side of the Commander in Chief
did you know that their act would be shallow and brief?
from the moment they sensed it was safe to resume
they reverted to gloom and they forecasted doom

yes, they've seized on each charge that might sever the bond
between People and President united so fond
first "he's moving too slow," then "he's rushing to war,"
from "connecting the dots," to "Bush Knew!" and there's more:

there was "No Blood For Oil," and "the French won't approve,"
and "without the U.N. we must not make a move."
"It's a quagmire," they claimed, and "the looting's too great,"
"the Museum's been emptied," (correction on page 48)

they bewailed "no food," and bemoaned "lack of water,"
scarcely noting Saddam no more rapes wives and daughters.
sixteen words caused such outrage and feigned indignation
by that same crowd that shilled for Slick's prevarications

with elections afoot, noses pressed to the pane,
this used-to-be-great Party's desperate to gain
a place at the levers of power once more,
even sowing discord in a nation at war.
could it be they don't care, or just don't understand,
that a kingdom divided cannot hope to stand?

yes, the Party of Truman and young JFK
now appears to have totally vanished away
like a stampede of lemmings, gone over a ledge
Dems have taken our politics beyond water's edge
though they saw how our enemies viciously kill
the Dems just do not get it, and they just never will.



Copyright September 11, 2003 by Larry Naselli

Posted by larry_naselli at 6:15 PM CDT
Updated: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 7:49 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, September 7, 2004
Oh say, can you see the connection?

Stung by the Swiftboat Vets for Truth book and TV ads, John Kerry has asserted a connection between President Bush's Campaign and the independent expenditure group. This from a man who denies that Saddam had links with Al Qaeda.


Posted by larry_naselli at 9:55 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, September 3, 2004
Mac-Attack?

I want to wish Bill Clinton good success and a speedy recovery from open-heart surgery. Of course, one can't help but wonder whether Clinton's heart trouble is a consequence of the high cholesterol in all those Big Macs he didn't eat.

As you pray for the former President, please remember the nurses at New York Presbyterian Hospital -- may they be fast on their feet, button their uniforms to the neck, and keep their backs to the wall.

Posted by larry_naselli at 1:31 PM CDT
Updated: Friday, September 3, 2004 1:36 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, September 1, 2004
Media's mis-characterization won't fool many

Responding directly to an interviewer's question, "can you win the War on Terrorism in the next four years?" President Bush explained that this war will not have a conclusion like conventional wars, with a peace treaty, or with one nation surrendering to another.

The President has expressed this same truth many times since 9/11, but the Old Media seized on the President's remark, being careful not to quote his words, but re-casting them out-of-context as "Bush says War on Terrorism is unwinnable." This kind of distortion might be expected from the Kerry Campaign (which did in fact commit the same distortion), but the News Media has no excuse for mis-characterizing the President's comment. If the mis-reporting was not a manifestation of anti-Bush Media partisanship, then it can only be a manifestation of Media incompetence.

Notwithstanding the gleeful feeding frenzy by the Media and Kerry Campaigns, does any serious person doubt that George W. Bush is determined to win America's War against Islamist Terrorism? Face it, Jihadists and tyrants toss and turn on their beds at the thought of President Bush winning a second term, while the election of a confirmed Dove like John Kerry would allow America's mortal enemies to once again get a good night's sleep.

Posted by larry_naselli at 10:09 AM CDT
Updated: Wednesday, September 1, 2004 10:18 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, August 30, 2004
Dangerous Crossing

Friday night my wife and I went to downtown Chicago with another couple, for a boat tour of the Chicago River and Lake Michigan. As we passed under a bridge, a passenger mentioned the now infamous Dave Matthews Band Bus incident of a few days before, which prompted us to (as non-chalantly as possible) shield our heads with our hands each time we floated beneath a bridge. As we did so, I was inspired to a limerick:

Two couples got onto a boat,
for a tour of the city, afloat.
With their hands overspreading
their heads, they were dreading
what each bus on each bridge might unload


Posted by larry_naselli at 1:28 PM CDT
Updated: Wednesday, September 1, 2004 10:17 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, August 17, 2004
Flip Flop

John Kerry's "handlers" have been keeping him away from the Press, as they scramble to compose a response to Kerry's hopelessly irreconcilable accounts of his 1968 "Christmas in Cambodia."

What the Kerry Campaign needs is a slam-dunk one-liner, that will put an abrupt end to all the dogged questions that mainstream media reporters haven't gotten around to asking, but some day may.

I think I have the nuanced answer that will extricate the Candidate from this predicament. How's this:

"I actually did cross into Cambodia . . . before I crossed back."


Posted by larry_naselli at 7:55 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
Double Standard for Vietnam Vets

Over the last seven months we have learned that any Senate vote John Kerry has cast, and any issue position John Kerry embraces is unassailable, because he is a Vietnam Veteran, and to say he is wrong about anything is to "question his patriotism."

Now two-hundred fifty Vietnam Veterans have given their word in print that Kerry's Vietnam service was not as heroic as Kerry himself has advertised, and the Candidate's surrogates have fanned out to discredit those Veterans.

If we are supposed to grant unquestioning credence to Kerry because he served in Vietnam, then why shouldn't Kerry's fellow Swift Boat Veterans enjoy the same magical credibility? They served in Vietnam too, so isn't anyone who disputes their motives or their veracity "questioning their patriotism"? Or does that line only work for Democrat politicians?


Posted by larry_naselli at 11:47 AM CDT
Updated: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 8:49 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, August 9, 2004
If his heroics are for real, Kerry should simply release his records and be vindicated

Earlier this year, when the Party of Michael Moore demanded that "deserter" George W. Bush release his military service records, Bush - whose records would supposedly be embarrassing - promptly released the records, which showed that he was a good fighter pilot, flying Cold War continental air-defense missions, and that his service was honorable, if undistinguished. Bush's records were a big dud for Democrats looking for a "smoking gun" to turn swing voters against the President.

Now, just as "war hero" John Kerry reports for duty, founding his campaign for President of the United States upon his putative heroics in Vietnam, those heroics have been called into question by a group of two-hundred of his fellow Vietnam War Swift Boat Veterans. So why doesn't Kerry - whose records would presumably bring him further glory - simply release the records and be vindicated?

Moreover, why does the same news media that gave such frenzied institence to the DNC-inspired "Bush was AWOL" hoopla, now seem so uninterested in seeing Kerry's military service records?


Posted by larry_naselli at 10:15 AM CDT
Updated: Monday, August 9, 2004 10:26 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Starring in the role he was born to play?

A guy like Barack Obama is politically dangerous enough -- well spoken, nice looking, youthful, beautiful family, smooth as butter, but every bit the Leftist as Howard Dean or Teddy Kennedy. He is an African American running in a blue, turning bluer state, where the African American vote in Cook County can swing the entire state, with strong turnout -- but to have Obama run for Senate uncontested makes him much stronger than he really is. Uncontested, Obama can simply smile his way into the U.S. Senate, without the People of Illinois ever having a hint of what a whacked-out Leftist he is.

The current situation does not call for a candidate - the seat is probably hopelessly lost for now - this situation calls for an assassin. I most emphatically do not mean character assassination, I mean issues assassination. Obama holds positions on issues ranging from taxes to same-sex marriage, and everything in-between, which are drastically out of step with most Illinois voters, and this election needs an opponent capable of exposing and hurting Obama on those issues. Alan Keyes is just such a man. In fact, this fall Alan Keyes may be starring in the role he was born to play.



Posted by larry_naselli at 9:38 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, August 6, 2004

Following are some handy guidelines for maintaining (or claiming to have had) a historically proper attitude toward Vietnam Veterans:

1967-1968 Vietnam Veterans are to be respected by ordinary law-abiding citizens, and maligned by long-haired, maggot-infested, tie-dyed, dope-smoking, communist-sympathizing, hippie freaks.

1969-1971 Vietnam Veterans are to be disrespected by ordinary law-abiding citizens, and maligned by long-haired, maggot-infested, tie-dyed, dope-smoking, communist-sympathizing, hippie freaks, and aspiring Democrat Party politicians.

1972-1979 Vietnam Veterans are to be forgotten by ordinary law-abiding citizens and aspiring Democrat Party politicians, and maligned by long-haired, maggot-infested, tie-dyed, dope-smoking, communist-sympathizing, hippie freaks.

1980-1991 Vietnam Veterans are to be pitied by ordinary law-abiding citizens, ignored by Democrat Party politicians, including those who have obtained haircuts, law degrees, Armani suits and seats in the United States Senate, and maligned by long-haired, maggot-infested, tie-dyed, dope-smoking, communist-sympathizing, hippie freaks.

1992-2000 Vietnam Veterans are to be forgotten by ordinary law-abiding citizens, ignored by Democrat Party politicians, including those who have obtained haircuts, law degrees, Armani suits and seats in the United States Senate, or turned the Oval Office into a bordello, and maligned by long-haired, maggot-infested, tie-dyed, dope-smoking, communist-sympathizing, hippie freaks.

2001-2003 Vietnam Veterans are to be ignored by all of the above, except Democrat Politicians who find disaffected Vietnam Vets to predict another Vietnam will result from any use of American military power.

2002-2004 Vietnam Veterans are to be revered by all, even by Democrat Politicians and long-haired, maggot-infested, etc... hippie freaks. A Vietnam Veteran is never to be questioned on any issue of policy, nor any Congressional vote cast. A Vietnam Veteran's military service alone qualifies him for the highest public office in the land, as well as for any inferior office, and puts his integrity and patriotism beyond question, notwithstanding any reprehensible actions the Vietnam Vet may have engaged in, during or after his service.

One teensy-weensy exception to this last rule would be respecting those Vietnam Veterans whose account of John Kerry's Vietnam service differ from Kerry's own self-aggrandizing account. Such Vietnam Veterans should be assumed to have been bought off by sinister Texas businessmen with close ties to Karl Rove and the Bush-Cheney-Halliburton-House of Saud 2004 Campaign. Such Vietnam Veterans are politically motivated liars, and should be discredited and smeared, when they're not being ignored altogether.



Posted by larry_naselli at 3:44 PM CDT
Updated: Monday, August 9, 2004 9:24 AM CDT
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink
Thursday, August 5, 2004
7 Minutes -vs- 12 Years

How does John Kerry figure that 7 minutes was too long for the President to wait before taking action on 9/11, but 12 years was too short a time to wait before taking action on Iraq?

Posted by larry_naselli at 5:33 PM CDT
Updated: Friday, August 6, 2004 3:15 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, August 2, 2004
Kerry Spells Out America's Choice: Revenge or Prevention

"I will never hesitate to use force when it is required. Any attack will be met with a swift and certain response." These words from John Kerry's acceptance speech define the life and death choice that Americans will make this November.

September 11, 2001 proved that Islamist terrorists are at war with the United States, and President Bush has fought that war with a strategy of destroying the terrorists where they train and plot, and targeting any government that aids terrorists as an enemy of the United States of America, to be pressured into halting its support for terrorism, or overthrown.

The object of such pre-emptive war is to deny our terrorist enemies safe havens, and the type of weapons that could make the 9/11 attacks pale by comparison. America's military might is being used to disable terrorist networks before they can mount another attack on our homeland.

By contrast, John Kerry has proclaimed that, as Commander in Chief, he would wait for America to be attacked again before taking military action. Kerry has promised a September 10th policy: "If attacked, I will respond." But it is September 12th, and the American People must decide whether we really ought to wait around for another attack and hope for the best, as John Kerry recommends.

Voters will choose in a few months whether America's military power will be used by a President Kerry to avenge the murder of our People, or by President Bush to prevent it.

Posted by larry_naselli at 9:10 AM CDT
Updated: Monday, August 2, 2004 10:40 AM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, July 30, 2004
Biggest Yet

The Democrat Convention featured John Kerry's most astonishing flip-flop yet. Until now, a positively notorious opponent and critic of the Vietnam War as an unjust and unneccessary use of American military power, Kerry proclaimed to the assembled delegates, "I defended this country as a young man and I will defend it as President."

STOP THE PRESSES!!! Are the American People to understand that Kerry now views the Vietnam War as a war to defend the United States of America? This is a breathtaking turnabout. If Kerry means what he said in his acceptance speech, the Country should soon be treated to the Candidate's apology for anti-war activities which opposed and maligned a war to defend of America.

As usual, the catch is: "if Kerry means what he says."

Posted by larry_naselli at 9:21 AM CDT
Updated: Tuesday, August 3, 2004 5:01 PM CDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older